News
Patent trolls against innovation and consumers 3/4
Monday, February 25, 2013 5:35 pm | By Christoph Elmiger

Patent trolls which start lawsuits mar the market,but these suits are not even shared on all patent classes. The study of James E. Bessen shows us that computer and communication patents account for seventy five percent of the lawsuits. In contrast, two percent of the suits involved chemical or drug patents. Software patents have been the major contributor to the recent explosion of lawsuits. With that in mind, what effect do these suits have on the market and, ultimately, the consumer? For starters, “Patent trolls have cost publicly traded defendants $500 billion since 1990.”  

Tags: IntProp atroptout Federal | Read More | Permalink | Comments (2)






Patent trolls and the case of MobileMedia Ideas LLC 2/4
Friday, February 22, 2013 4:30 pm | By Christoph Elmiger

 According to research by Colleen Chien, a professor of Law at the Santa Clara University, until December 1st 2012, more than 60 percent of all patent lawsuits were introduced by patent-assertion entities or companies whose business model is to assert  patents. They behave in this way, rather than build and research their own technology. There trend has been increasing more than 15 percent in 2011 and 37 percent in comparison to five years ago.

Tags: IntProp atroptout Federal | Read More | Permalink | Comments






About “patent trolls” and property rights! 1/4
Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:00 pm | By Christoph Elmiger

In the last few months, we’ve read again and again about lawsuits between producing companies and companies whose only interest is to make money with the patent pool they own, but never use (prominent case Apple against MobileMedia). These companies are also known as patent trolls. A patent troll is a term used for a person or company that enforces its patents against one or more alleged infringers in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunistic, often with no intention to manufacture or market the product. A related, but less pejorative expression is non-practicing entity (NPE), which describes a patent owner who does not manufacture or use the patented invention. Essentially “patent trolls” purchase patents, often from bankrupt firms, with the intent to sue other firms which may actually use this patent. They try to force patents, but have no interest in a manufacturing or research base.

Tags: IntProp atroptout Federal | Read More | Permalink | Comments






<< Previous 123456789...4647Next >>