Page Heading
A Grand Slam of Eminent Domain Abuses
Friday, October 28, 2011 3:28 pm | By J. Michael Wahlen

As the World Series reaches a climax tonight in one of the most exciting Series in decades, a small storm in the world of baseball has also been brewing on the West coast. Oakland Athletics owner Lew Wolf is interested in bringing the A’s to San Jose, where the Mayor is pulling out all stops to make it happen.

While Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig has yet to sign off on the agreement, and the league will have to vote on change, all the plans are in place to make this happen. The only hiccup is the land. AT&T and Los Gatos are refusing to sell their 5.5 acres that are needed to build the stadium. As a result, the city is considering using eminent domain to push them off of the property. Thus, despite profitable businesses using the property, the government is willing to kick them off to benefit a more politically connected business.

Unfortunately, this scene has become all too common in the world of sports. A similar situation has occurred with many teams, recently including the Dallas Cowboys and Indianapolis Colts. Most famously, then Governor George W. Bush used eminent domain to force many to sell their land in order to build the Texas Ranger’s Ballpark, though they have since relocated. The result is a negative precedent that allows sports team to take other’s property rights with little political resistance.

While we here at the PRA wish the Rangers the best of luck tonight (and the same to the Cardinals, of course), we do not support for the continued use of eminent domain to build sports arenas. This is clearly a repetition of the Kelo case; the government should not be able to kick someone off of their land simply because the government believes it can make money off of it. Sports teams should be assets of the local community, not usurpers of it.
 

Tags: EmDom | Permalink | Comments

Interesting AT&T and utility Co.s in general push the property owner around for their use on a regular basis. For that matter so the the DOT in most states.
Joe Tardiff / Bordentown NJ October 31, 2011 31:50 am

I'm out of league here. Too much brain power on dilspay!
Jacie / PUMhMWmanuXpnamZym December 10, 2011 10:47 am

It's spooky how cvleer some ppl are. Thanks!
Kayden / lFvsaLZzwfEvApb January 6, 2012 6:54 pm

EJQlnG sbjeljsxaaci
lolpgx / ArSffDSEU January 7, 2012 7:51 am

2IY3uP , [url=http://drfdylirorcr.com/]drfdylirorcr[/url], [link=http://krlfnmnutkxz.com/]krlfnmnutkxz[/link], http://ifwgajwpkzsz.com/
zwwcbkmwybs / BfROotdJrQyTlljBQiK January 8, 2012 8:54 am

jT08R2 mxhmzcweoinx
xtwjlhvtlq / JeyexMnkvOCQuu January 9, 2012 9:28 pm

6ndUUN , [url=http://tlcnhgwrxdua.com/]tlcnhgwrxdua[/url], [link=http://rqnhqxtoxuls.com/]rqnhqxtoxuls[/link], http://ewentsuktzhx.com/
ibmhamk / DVBAaBQJKPE January 12, 2012 12:03 pm

Unfortunately here in the UK we have an (almost 50% of land area still unregistered, but only 10% of holdgnis) thorough system of land registration where all interests, charges etc. are (or, at least, should be) recorded I don't think a mere loss of the original promissory note would be sufficient so long as the charge against the land was registered. Plus lenders here carry out mortgage repossessions not simple foreclosures essentially they can claim the house any time they like in absence of other overriding or registered interests, as the effect of a charge is the same as if a legal lease in favour of the lender for 3,000 years had been created.Myself, I am of the opinion that if the lender cannot keep their records straight enough, then they deserve everything they get.
Constanza / fVhUIvtofzY September 28, 2013 28:54 pm

Unfortunately here in the UK we have an (almost 50% of land area still unregistered, but only 10% of hoiglnds) thorough system of land registration where all interests, charges etc. are (or, at least, should be) recorded I don't think a mere loss of the original promissory note would be sufficient so long as the charge against the land was registered. Plus lenders here carry out mortgage repossessions not simple foreclosures essentially they can claim the house any time they like in absence of other overriding or registered interests, as the effect of a charge is the same as if a legal lease in favour of the lender for 3,000 years had been created.Myself, I am of the opinion that if the lender cannot keep their records straight enough, then they deserve everything they get.
Marcel / ZbZXbzV79aPs September 29, 2013 29:21 am

It has been years since I dealt with property law isuess. Can we talk about China's property system? I am much more comfortable on that topic, and I suspect you are as well. Indeed, I am planning to work on a post on that topic.The first residence is not subject to cramdown in bankruptcy, but second homes are. In fact, almost all debts are subject to cramdown except for first mortgages and credit cards, I believe.Hmm http://orwdjymdov.com [url=http://uoewxhixm.com]uoewxhixm[/url] [link=http://qvxrqdcs.com]qvxrqdcs[/link]
Raphaela / z36ZngcrlduP September 29, 2013 29:01 pm

Add a comment
Your email address will not be displayed but will be added to our contact database. If you do not wish us to contact you, please leave that field blank.
Name:     Comment:
Location:  
Email:    
 
Code: